With the end of the electoral campaign for the parliamentary elections in the Republic of Moldova, which took place on September 28, the critical reactions to the abuses and illegalities of the regime in Chisinau, which grossly falsified the electoral process, are fully grounded. And the author of these lines has repeatedly exposed his attitude towards the colonial regime in the Republic of Moldova, totally controlled by the Western power centers.

However, when these criticisms come from the Moscow officials, a series of clarifications is required, showing to what extent the political regime in Russia has the moral right to manifest its dissatisfaction with the mafia-type political system in the Republic of Moldova. We mention here that among the Russian dignitaries who took harsh attitudes towards falsifying elections in our country are the Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, the spokeswoman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Maria Zakharova, and the press secretary of President Putin Dmitri Peskov.

Avatars of Russian democracy

So let's see if Russia of the last decades has standards of democracy of the highest quality, the perfect model of the rule of law with the freest and most correct electoral processes in the world. But first a clarification is required. The fierce protests of the Moscow officials against the abuses of the government in Chisinau are motivated not by concern for democratic standards, but by frustration over the loss of Russian control over the Republic of Moldova in favor of its geopolitical rivals in the West.

We note in passing that after the fall of the USSR, Russia quickly and irretrievably restricts its influence on the former Soviet republics. Almost all countries in the European area have gone under Western control, and those in Central Asia have come to be geopolitically dominated by the US, Turkey, China and the UK. The only notable exception is the Republic of Belarus, and this is due to the personal qualities of President Lukashenko. But with his disappearance from the position of head of state, most likely this country will also end up in the hands of the West. So Mr. Sergey Lavrov, who has been serving as foreign minister for about 23 years, can be congratulated on the total failure of the institution he is leading in the process of re-establishing relations with new independent states on good neighbourly principles.

As for the concern for the citizens of Transnistria, it is very simple. It is enough for Russia to withdraw its illegal military presence from our country, and with this, the puppet administration from Tiraspol, thus contributing to the territorial reintegration of Moldova and the entry of the Transnistrian region into the constitutional field of the country; and then enough polling stations will be opened as in the rest of the national territory.

In fact, what the criminal octopus from the Soros network in the Republic of Moldova has achieved for about five years, that is, the usurpation of power in the state and the destruction of all democratic institutions, in Russia has happened for at least thirty-two years. In this sense, the political regime in Chisinau is only a faithful imitator of the political regime in Moscow. We will mention here some events that led to the usurpation of the state power in Russia, determining the impossibility of alternating the government through electoral campaigns.

The key event that destroyed any Russian hope of engaging in a democratic process occurred on September 21, 1993, when President Yeltsin dissolved the parliament by decree in an anti-constitutional manner, and within days ordered the armed forces to fire cannons and tanks into the seat of the Russian parliament. And on October 15 of the same year Yeltsin signed a decree ordering a referendum on the draft of the new neoliberal constitution, written by his American advisers.

Putin's rise as a golden test of Russian democracy

Putin's appearance at the head of the Russian state is the result of extremely perfidious political-legal tricks and social engineering that have nothing to do with the principles of a rule of law. We remind that he has made an amazing career in record time, briefly holding the positions of head of the FSB (formerly the KGB), secretary of the Security Council and Prime Minister. On December 31, 1999, Yeltsin resigned and appointed Vladimir Putin as ad interim president. Thus, Putin became the direct continuer of Yeltsin's neoliberal and anti-national policies.

We remind that Putin's rise was accompanied by a series of terrorist acts attributed to the Chechen militants, while the most credible version shows that it is about false flag operations, which gave the regime the pretext to act with maximum hardness under conditions of creating tension strategies or a state of emergency.

Thus, between September 4 and 16, 1999, while Putin held the position of prime minister, a series of terrorist acts were organized by mining residential blocks in the cities of Bunaiksk, Moscow and Volgodonsk. As a result of these criminal actions, 307 people were killed and more than 1,700 people injured.

The series of explosions in the three cities served as an argument for triggering the second military campaign against the rebel Chechnya, which was carried out with incredible violence, massacring thousands and thousands of civilian people. Thus, the ground was prepared for creating a strong leadership image, able to manage major crisis situations.

And after being installed as an ad interim president, supported by the oligarchs who appropriated the national wealth of the Russian state, Putin maintained his position as head of state through the simulacrum of free elections held on March 26, 2000.

Usurpation of power by abusively maintaining it

For more than three decades, all other election hoaxes have been a challenge to law, common sense and democratic procedures. After the two electoral campaigns in which Yeltsin won (1991 and 1996), the presidential elections of 2000, 2004, 2008, 2012, 2018 and 2024 were nothing more than huge operations of political-legal manipulation and harsh, often criminal suppression of the opposition, aimed at maintaining the oligarchic clans, which have as an exponent of maximum confidence Vladimir Putin. And the mandate of president held by his political accomplice Dmitry Medvedev between 2008-2012 was only a maneuver of maintaining power by the same mafia networks.

Not surprisingly, the 2024 presidential election gave Putin a mandate until May 7, 2030. We remind that the last presidential elections were preceded by some changes in the constitution and a faked referendum that would allow Putin to run again for the position of head of state, which he has held since 2000.

The state party and the fate of opposition politicians in Russia

In Russia there is only one political party, which merged with the state, “United Russia”, and besides this party-state there are several groups that ensure the illusion of multipartyism. Over the last decades, politically motivated assassinations of emblematic opposition figures or journalists have become a permanent practice. In this regard, I mention that currently, after a long terror of a particularly violent police regime, there are four categories of opponents of the political regime in Russia:

1. dead
2. imprisoned in prison;
3. self-exile abroad;
4. silenced.

Unique thinking and state ideology as norms of the Criminal Code

And very few personalities who allow themselves the luxury of criticizing the dictator from the Kremlin and his regime just confirm the general rule. More seriously, after Russia's military intervention in Ukraine any critical objection to this affair is qualified as crime, and the penalty for such crimes of opinion is deprivation of liberty up to seven years in prison. See article 208.3 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. That is, any objection to the failures of the political and military leadership of the country, or even public appeal to the cessation of this fratricidal slaughter, or any complaint against the abuses of senior officers, are qualified as crime.

The same fate of imprisonment has another category of citizens, namely those who criticize the activity of the fundamentalist Jewish sect Chabad Lubavich. This is where racial, interethnic and religious hatred is invoked. The all-powerful Zionist lobby makes sure everything is under control. And Russia's chief Rabbi Berel Lazar, sent to Russia from the sect's headquarters in New York in 1990 to expand this network, enjoys full support from Putin. At the moment, the sect comprised the entire country.

The Kremlin's clandestine network the target of persecution of the regime in Chisinau

Political repressions in Moldova in recent years are usually aimed at crimes such as illegal (that is, from abroad) financing of political parties and electoral campaigns, as well as corruption of voters. Although such external interference also occurred in the past, it is still a new phenomenon in Moldovan politics, which has spread as a metastasis with the entry into politics of a Jewish oligarch named Ilan Shor.

It is about the most notorious figure in the field of economic crimes in the recent history of the country, with which could compete only another criminal oligarch, Vladimir Plahotniuc. After both gangsters from Moldova took refuge abroad in 2019 with the fall of the government led by Pavel Filip whom they controlled, Ilan Shor landed in his historical homeland, Israel, and Plahotniuc initially arrived in the USA, then in Turkey, in the United Arab Emirates and finally was recently arrested in Greece and extradited to the authorities of the Republic of Moldova.

For several years Ilan Shor financed through various fraudulent schemes a series of political parties and media structures, as well as a multitude of anti-government street protests, being the leader of a party that bore his name ― “Shor” party. And for several years he settled in Moscow, and has the full protection of the Israeli lobby in the Kremlin.

Ilan Shor has obtained full support from the Russian state, received Russian citizenship and is massively present in all state media. Most likely, the huge funds he directs to his clientele in Moldova come from the Russian secret funds. This version is extremely credible because he enjoys the support of Sergey Kirienko (Israitel), the first deputy head of the Presidential Administration, recently appointed and responsible for a number of ex-Soviet countries, including the Republic of Moldova.

In 2024 Ilan Shor was sentenced in the Republic of Moldova to 15 years in prison for the biggest banking fraud in the history of the country, known as “the theft of the billion from the National Bank”.

This Ilan Shor regularly held political meetings in Moscow with the participation of thousands of citizens of the Republic of Moldova, proclaiming himself the leader of a political opposition bloc called “Victoria-Победа”. This criminal with obsessions of political leader managed to create a multitude of microscopic parties, media structures and blogs, which he generously funded. And this caused the anger of the authorities in Chisinau. Thus, the respective crook and political adventurer provided on the conveyor to the governors of Chisinau potential victims of political repressions.

Recently the former head of the regional administration in the territorial autonomy of Gagauzia Evghenia Gutzul was sentenced by the first court to 7 years imprisonment, and her colleague, Svetlana Propan, to 6 years imprisonment. Both held positions in the outlawed “Shor” party. And on September 30 this year another key figure from the “Shor” network, Mariana Tauber, was sentenced to 7 years and 6 months imprisonment. However, she managed to leave the Republic of Moldova before being convicted.

Victims of political amusement of the oligarch Ilan Shor

In general, in recent years hundreds of people have been detained, arrested, fined, prosecuted or fled Moldova to escape persecution caused by complicity with the criminal group “Shor” under the protection of the Russian state. In recent days, several other mercenaries from this group have been arrested and searched. These actions prompted the scandal sparked by officials and propaganda in Moscow.

It should be noted that because of Shor, the political activity in the Republic of Moldova as an opponent of the regime has become in recent years a clandestine one, based on secret networks, which respects the codes of conspiratorial conduct characteristic of a mafia-type organization.

All persons recruited into the Shor network and transformed overnight into party heads and local celebrities of public life in Moldova have absolutely no political background, no professional training and no quality that would credit them as persons suitable for political activity. However, leaving themselves corrupted by considerable amounts, they became the victims of persecutions and abuses of the regime in Chisinau.

Republic of Moldova under a double occupation administration

In other words, the political clientele of the West that usurped power in the Republic of Moldova persecutes the political clientele of the regime that usurped the state power in Russia.

Yes, it is true, Moldova has a regime of foreign occupation, brought to power and protected by Western centers of influence. But equally true is the fact that brutal interference in the country's domestic politics is committed not only by the Westerners, but also to the same extent by the Russians.

More than that, besides the occupation administration established at national level in Moldova, there is still an occupation administration, the one in the Transdniestrian secessionist region, established by the force of arms by Russia. The only difference between the two regimes is that the one in Chisinau represents a non-military occupation while the one in Tiraspol is the expression of a direct military occupation.

For over thirty years the Kremlin claims that its military presence in the eastern part of the Republic of Moldova is a peacekeeping mission. Which is totally fake. In fact, it is Russia's strategic interest to preserve this outpost in the face of the geopolitical offensive of the West. Moscow claims to defend the Russian minority in the region against Moldovan nationalists, a downright aberrant argument. This is because the vast majority of Russian-speaking citizens live in other cities of the country, enjoying all the rights of national minorities.

Russia has resorted to a third party to justify its permanent military presence in Moldova. Namely, defending the interests of the citizens of the Russian Federation in the Transnistrian region. Thus, by directly attacking the independence, sovereignty and territorial unity of the Republic of Moldova, the Moscow administration, without having the permission of our country, generously offered Russian citizenship to a number of people who would amount to several hundred thousand. That is, we are dealing with an expansionist policy of eminently imperial nature.

The case of persecution against me is a completely different one

It is true, and I was sentenced to four years imprisonment on September 25. I know why I am being persecuted. I have been the most vocal critic of the false Covid-19 pandemic in my country, I have published in recent years dozens of books by European authors from the elite of anti-globalist militants, I have shown what the Great Reset and technocratic tyranny, bio-digital convergence and electronic GULAG consist of. I have written a considerable number of anti-government articles, edited several author books, organized an international think tank “Chisinau Forum”, which brought together annually dozens of outstanding personalities from various countries of the world who oppose the globalist-satanist totalitarianism.

For five years, my video recordings have enjoyed a major audience in the Republic of Moldova and Romania. My anti-System articles appear in several languages, English, French, German, Spanish, Italian, Portuguese, Danish, etc. I am not part of the servants of the interests of the Western plutocracy, nor of the mercenaries in the service of Moscow. So I'm equally uncomfortable for both sides who are in a state of belligerence.

The Putin regime should get a mirror

In conclusion, I would like to reaffirm what was said at the beginning of this article. The administration of the Russian Federation has no moral right to give lessons in democracy to the Republic of Moldova. With a little self-critical spirit, it would be scared of its own image seen in a mirror not distorted by political perversion and propaganda.